Editor note: see the updated version of this post here. As described in previous posts, WebRTC does not specify a particular signalling model other than the generic need to exchange Session Description Protocol (SDP) media descriptions in the offer/answer fashion. During the last few months, my friend Antón Román (CTO of Quobis) and I spent a lot […]
ICE always tastes better when it trickles! (Emil Ivov)
For the last year and a half I’ve been working with a number of customers helping them to understand what WebRTC is about, supporting them in the definition of new products, services, and in some cases even developing WebRTC prototypes/labs for them. I’ve spent time with Service Providers, Enterprise and OTT customers and the very […]
The Open Source rfc5766-turn-server Project – Interview with Oleg Moskalenko
As Reid previously introduced in his An Intro to WebRTC’s NAT/Firewall Problem post, NAT traversal is often one the more mysterious areas of WebRTC for those without a VoIP background. When two endpoints/applications behind NAT wish to exchange media or data with each other, they use “hole punching” techniques in order to discover a direct communication […]
WebRTC Video Codec Decision is… NO DECISION
As we discussed in previous posts, the IETF is meeting this week in Vancouver. Lots of interesting discussing including two sessions for the RTCWeb WG; the agenda for the two sessions can be found here. The first session, which was held on Monday, was mainly about updates on the JSEP (Javascript Session Establishment Protocol) specification, […]
WebRTC Video Codec Debate Positions Infographic
With all the drama of the video codec debate ramping up for a Mandatory To Implement (MTI) decision (previously discussed here and here), hopefully it will be a minor footnote in the history of the WebRTC very soon. If you had to summarize the possible outcomes, interested stakeholders, and sentiments in one picture, here is […]